trichview.support
Re: TRichView vs WPTools |
Author |
Message |
Louis Kessler |
Posted: 06/12/2003 16:11:30 Several years ago, I tried WPTools but then switched to TRichview. I work with very large documents and WPTools is much slower (like 10 times slower) to load and process large documents than TRichview. WPTools also uses much more memory (about 4 times as much if I recall). I contacted the author Julian Ziersch and he had said that this was because of the internal processing in WPTools, which is on a character by character basis. As a result, he said it was not possible to make it much faster or use less memory. Louis Kessler Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada "Sergey Tkachenko" <svt@trichview.com> wrote in message news:3ee795d7@support.torry.net... > Some pros for TRichView > - better support of tables (as far as I know, WPTools does not support: > nested tables; multiple paragraphs in table cells (try to make one line > centered and one line left-aligned in WPTools' table cells, or try to create > a bulleted list in table cell); vertical cell merging; vertical cell > alignment; background pictures. All the listed features are supported by > RV); > - Unicode support; > - Delphi components in documents; > - I am not sure here, but it looks like bullets/numbering is more flexible > in TRichView (can WPTools create a numbering like: > 1. **** > 1.a. **** > 2. **** > 2.a. **** > 2.b. **** > ?) > - more visually attractive components for creating user interface > (RichViewActions - http://www.trichview.com/resources/actions/) > > Some pros for WPTools > - WYSIWYG editing (you can see page size in editor; in TRichView, page size > can be seen only in read-only TRVPrint) > - tabs (RichView does not support tab positions yet) > > Some things that I recommend to look at: > - quality of RTF and HTML import and export (I am quite proud of TRichView > in this field) > - convenience of programming interface > > > > Hi to all! > > > > I am currently examining different text edit controls and find TRichView > and > > WPTools to be the best. However they look very similarly to me as > > functionality and I am wondering what is the difference between them? > > > > Has anyone tried both or know the difference? > > > > Yours sincerely, > > Petko > > Milenix Software Ltd. > > http://www.milenix.com > > > > > > |
Powered by ABC Amber Outlook Express Converter