trichview.support
Re: TRichView vs WPTools |
Author |
Message |
Chia Chen Yap |
Posted: 12/18/2003 4:26:55 > it produces code that doesn't validate on the W3C validator, and doesn't > even specify what DTD it's supposed to conform to. Can someone explain this to me? If I were to embed the exported HTML body into other web page, will it be affected by the above problem? regards, Chen Yap "Martin Holmes" <mholmes@uvic.ca> wrote in message news:3fdf7fc9$1@support.torry.net... > For me, the key thing is Unicode support. Anyone developing a text-based > application who is ignoring Unicode at this point won't have much of a > future. > > The HTML output from TRichView is one of my least-favourite features; it > produces code that doesn't validate on the W3C validator, and doesn't > even specify what DTD it's supposed to conform to. I'll be really happy > when we can get proper XHTML output that validates. An application I use > regularly, FastHelp, is based around TRichView, and its HTML output is > unusable. > > Cheers, > Martin > > Petko wrote: > > Hi to all! > > > > I am currently examining different text edit controls and find TRichView and > > WPTools to be the best. However they look very similarly to me as > > functionality and I am wondering what is the difference between them? > > > > Has anyone tried both or know the difference? > > > > Yours sincerely, > > Petko > > Milenix Software Ltd. > > http://www.milenix.com > > > > |
Powered by ABC Amber Outlook Express Converter