Re: TRichView vs. WpTools

Author

Message

Torsten

Posted: 02/21/2002 6:16:19

Hi Sergey,

could you move up the 'left/right alignment

of images' to the second place ? You need

this for html-import anyway. And since most

users can use MS Word, office-converters or IE

for converting to rtf, the html-import is not

such a critical issue ( at least IMHO ).

Torsten

"Sergey Tkachenko" <svt@trichview.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag

news:3c7370f8$5@support.torry.net...

> My current work priorities:

> - bullets/numbering (multilevel, with many options)

> - html import (probably without CSS at the first stage)

> - live spelling

> - drag and drop

> - improvements in formatting (tabs, left/right alignment of images)

> - WYSIWYG

> and some simple tasks like headers/footers or image resizing as a

background

> work.

> So WYSIWYG will be implemented not very soon.

> I am trying not to hurry with new features but implementing them in the

best

> possible way.

> RV and WPT have slightly different "patterns".

> WPTools is more like MS Word.

> RichView is more like IE/visual html editors.

> This difference can be clearly seen comparing tables in WPT and RV.

> > Looking at this iste and at the demos I see that the main features

wpTools

> > has and TRichEdit lacks are WYSIWYG page layout mode, headers and

footers,

> > background spellchecking a la Word and columns. In truth I have never

used

> > colums, as they have never been requested, and can live without

background

> > spell checking though it would be nice and not to difficoult to

implement.

> > But may clients certainly equire page layout mode (with active rulers)

and

> > headers and footers. Do you have any plans for these features?