Re: RVF Transportable question

Author

Message

Alan McDonald

Posted: 01/12/2005 9:13:55

I think I'm going to try to use the native RVF everywhere, but I;ll need to

ask some questions about printing.

thanks

Alan

"Sergey Tkachenko" <svt@trichview.com> wrote in message

news:41e27022$1@support.torry.net...

> Will users transfer document by e-mail as attachments?

> Do you want them will be able to open this attachment in external

> applications?

> Transferring in RVF format has one main advantage - document is

transferred

> as it is, without any modifications.

> If you convert it to another format (for example, RTF) for transferring,

> some features that cannot be saved in this format will be lost.

> > I just mean - what's the most reliable way to transport the fields.

> > I have then normally resident in a Firebird database. My users need to

> email

> > the contents of the richtext to their client. So I need to save-as the

> > content into a file then email them and read them back into another

> Firebord

> > database for further review. I just wondered what the most reliable

means

> of

> > doing this is, considering I'm working in the native rvf format.

> > I could use kbmemtable and the binary I/O to extract and insert or I

could

> > save as rtf output for the purpose of transport.

> > Alan