trichview.support
Re: Richview performance when loading large content |
Author |
Message |
Baliga, Narasimha |
Posted: 09/10/2004 14:53:49 Found it, I have version 1.7, OnSaveItemToFile is introduced in 1.8 Time to upgrade... :) regards Baliga "Baliga, Narasimha" <nbaliga@tiersolution.com> wrote in message news:41418ccb@support.torry.net... > Sorry for being dumb, but I don't see any event like > RichViewEdit1SaveItemToFile, I do have > RichViewEditContentSaveComponentToFile. Is it because of version? > > regards > Baliga > > "Sergey Tkachenko" <svt@trichview.com> wrote in message > news:41417875$1@support.torry.net... >> Images are stored in RTF in very nonoptimal way. >> True color bitmaps are huge by themselves (1024 *768 takes several >> megabytes), and they are doubled in size in RTF (because each byte is >> encoded by two hexadecimal digits). >> >> Suggestions: >> 1) Use Png instead of bitmaps. >> http://www.trichview.com/support/dnewsweb.cgi?cmd=article&group=trichview.support.examples&item=205&utag= >> 2) Always call RichViewEdit.DeleteUnusedStyles before saving to the >> field. A >> number of unused styles increase data size and slow down loading and >> saving >> >>> One more thing, suppose I don;t use a DBRichEdit and just RichViewEdit >>> instead and try to read from Bloba field to Stream and then from Stream >>> to >>> the Rich Edit component... this also takes a long time if the content is >> RTF >>> with say 2 screen shots embedded... >> >> >> > > |
Powered by ABC Amber Outlook Express Converter