Re: Master/Detail Fields in the DBRichViewEdit

Author

Message

Diogo

Posted: 04/19/2005 15:25:03

Ok Rob, thanks.

I did not understood very well.

If you are not bothered, you would have as to explain its suggestion better

to me?

"Rob" <rschoenaker@NOhotmailSPAM.com> wrote:

>Diogo,

>Yes, this is the way to do it. What I would suggest you do is flatten the

>tabel to have calculated fields, which you can insert by their name. This

>way, the RichView can use a standard document and you do not need to worry

>about identical fields.

>/Rob