Re: GetItemAtEx

Author

Message

Christian Kirchhoff

Posted: 10/02/2002 14:36:18

Hallo,

thanks for the reply. I weren't able to solve that problem, yet.

First: as you can see in my exemplary code, I called this procedure as a

procedure of rv.RVData. The appropriate line of code is:

MyRichViewEdit.RVData.GetItemAtEx(X,Y,RVData,ItemNo,Offs);

Delphi's compiler says that this procedure is not defined.

If I was just missing an additional parameter, Delphi's compiler would have

told me that. Therefore I presume that this procedure does not exist in version

1.5.4.

I searched the whole source code of the TRichView components for the procedure

GetItemAtEx and it couldn't be found. Therefore I kindly ask you to think

about this problem again and tell me what I could have done wrong.

Thanks in advance,

Christian Kirchhoff

"Sergey Tkachenko" <svt@trichview.com> wrote:

>This procedure is still there.

>But this procedure is rv.RVData, not of rv. It has additional parameter,

>which should be False in this case.

>> Hello,

>> some days ago I found some code that allows to move the caret pos while

>> object ios dragged onto a TRichViewEdit component. Basically in the

>> OnDragOver event handler a WM_SETCARETPOS is triggered which eventually

>> calls a procedure similar to this:

>> procedure MoveCaretTo(X, Y: Integer);

>> var

>> RVData: TCustomRVFormattedData;

>> ItemNo, Offs: Integer;

>> begin

>> inc(X, MyRichViewEdit.HScrollPos);

>> inc(Y, MyRichViewEdit.VScrollPos*MyRichViewEdit.VSmallStep);

>> MyRichViewEdit.RVData.GetItemAtEx(X,Y,RVData,ItemNo,Offs);

>> if ItemNo<0 then

>> exit;

>> if RVData is TRVTableCellData then begin

>> TRVTableCellData(RVData).Edit;

>> RVData := TCustomRVFormattedData(RVData.GetRVData);

>> end;

>> RVData.SetSelectionBounds(ItemNo, Offs, ItemNo, Offs);

>> RVData.Invalidate;

>> end;

>> When I was testing this, I used an unregistered version of TRichView.

>After

>> installing the registered version (1.5.4), the procedure "GetItemAtEx"

>> cannot be found any more. Is there a workaround?

>> Regards,

>> Christian Kirchhoff