trichview.support
Re: Extending TRichView in a maintainable way |
Author |
Message |
Martin Holmes |
Posted: 09/11/2004 6:36:36 How much would it cost to make xhtml 1.1 top of the priority list? For you, I think it's easy; it's just a question of fixing the case of tags, attribute quote marks, etc., in the existing HTML output. For me, it's an awful job because I have to re-integrate my changes into every update you put out. I bet it would take you less than an hour, and I'd pay $200 US (that's really all I can afford). Anyone else want to chip in? My current project is stalled until we have this, and it'd be worth the money to me. I've been waiting a year already, and if you keep stalling on it, I'm screwed. If you didn't intend to do it, I really wish you hadn't promised it in 2002. I wouldn't have put all this time into learning TRichView without that promise. For nearly three years, valid XHTML has been an absolute condition of all our projects. I couldn't release any product with obsolete html output even if I wanted to. If you make the current output XHTML 1.1, it will still work just fine on old browsers, but it'll have all the great advantages of being valid XML as well. I don't see any reason for not doing this. Please go for it! Cheers, Martin Sergey Tkachenko wrote: > Well, very probably XHTML will be one of new features of next major update. > But right now I have many things that I'll try to implement as soon as > possible: > - "real" styles > - measurement in resolution independent coordinates (mm, inches, twips) > instead of pixels > - (may be) clipboard support for multicell selection > > |
Powered by ABC Amber Outlook Express Converter