trichview.support.thirdparty
Re: HTML & RVF |
Author |
Message |
shmp |
Posted: 12/17/2003 2:46:03 Hi, I do believe that RVE was and still is created not for the purpose of HTML alone. I am among those very few who is using RVE ever since its first release. It was not targeted for HTML. But due to demands, Sergey has made many changes especially with regards to importing & exporting of HTML. I guess it would be obviously nice to have a perfect importing & exporting, but there are already software written based on RVE that are not in any way connected to HTML and it would be unwise to ignore them :( I would prefer, since there are already many HTML editors, to develop something new even if it would be based on RVF. If it is possible, I would prefer to make a new browser based on RVF rather than HTML. HTML do have its weaknesses. It can easily be abused. So to implement all the abilities of HTML would mean that RVF would be shifted solely for the purpose of HTML and would kill the original concept of RVF. Let RVF be multi-purpose :) Thank you. Regards. Henry M. Pianzin > > Hello all, > > I want to start a discusion on RVF&HTML. I think a great feature of RVE > would be to be able to import & export HTML. I know both features are > actually implemented, but I mean something different - All the abilities > that RVE formatting has and they exist in HTML to be able to be imported > correctly into RVE. In other words, if something exists in both RVF format > and HTML format, then it should both import/export correctly(which, at the > moment, is not so at all, there are lots of examples). This will enable RVE > to be greatly capable of doing all kinds of HTML stuff and will widen its > application - it can be used in a great variety of other programmes - HTML > editors, for example. > > So, what do you think? > --Slavi > > > > |
Powered by ABC Amber Outlook Express Converter