Re: HTML & RVF

Return to index

Author

Message

shmp

Posted: 12/17/2003 20:30:08

Please, this is only my opinion and nothing more. What I have expressed

so far is that I have indicated HTML as not my priority or so it seems.

> I guess you have not understood what I mean. I have not said "I have an

> idea, I have an idea, I have an idea! Let's do it! Let's do it!". I kind

of

> offered that, and I wanted the public opinion - if noone needs it, it is

> certainly going to be on the bottom of TODOs. What is more, if I needed

that

> badly, I could have implement it by myself already :) But the reason I

> posted was to cause a public discussion - I believe these are always

useful

> and if not for me, it is certainly useful for Sergey to know what to do

with

> higher priority and what - with lover. Not to forget that "patching" RVE

> every time a new version is released would be stupid, since I neither need

> it urgently, nor I can write it better than Sergey who knows his project

in

> deep.

>

It does sound stupid isn't it? It is just another opinion. But would others

react in the same manner especially to those who have started using RVE

a long time ago? I wonder.