Search found 3 matches
Yes, it does. The MS HTML converter emits the META charset tag to this encoding. I think, every RTF should always got Charset written in its tag. Atleast always, when it contains any character >=0x80 in it. With \ansicpg0, the MS HTML converter do not emit META Charset at all, which is pretty nice ...
ansicpg
Hello, I found some RichView generated RTF files has got \ansicpg0 in their header. The 0 is not valid parametr on this tag (RTF readers do not use CP_ACP as a default). Also \fcharset1 in font table is not normally written by Word and some RTF readers got a problem with it (like MS RTF->HTML ...
- Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:28 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Error with a RTF
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14397
RTF \clcbpat-1
Hello,
as far as I see (and study the MS' RTF specification) the \clcbpat have the parameter as index to color table. No -1 allowed.
Or am I wrong? What that -1 should mean?
Regards,
Martin
btw: RV generated RTFs do not pass our validating parser becouse of this.
as far as I see (and study the MS' RTF specification) the \clcbpat have the parameter as index to color table. No -1 allowed.
Or am I wrong? What that -1 should mean?
Regards,
Martin
btw: RV generated RTFs do not pass our validating parser becouse of this.